Proposed resolutions are in the comment header block.
Updated 8 January 2004


 _____________________________________________________________________________
 COMMENT                                          Enhancement Request Number 1
 ktill                                  BUG in COE_Linux_PS (rdvk#  4)
 {SGI-1}                                        Fri, 2 Jan 2004 09:59:22 -0800
 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Accept_____    Accept as marked below_X___     Duplicate_____     Reject_____
 Rationale for rejected or partial changes:

We accept that there is a potential issue here, however this is not
the place te state the version information, and so no change has been
identified as being needed to this product standard .

This does raise the issue of which version of the validation procedures
should be required for Linux as the indicator of compliance. An
agenda item should be raised for the next Forum meeting to determine.
Its possible we could list 4.2p6 or later in the authorized indicators
file (a separate file on The Open Group's COE Certification site)

 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Page: 4  Line: 53  Section:


 Problem:

 The Linux Application Platform Compliance Criteria is referencing
 www.disa.mil/ges/coe_kpc/index.html where the "Linux Validation
 Procedures" documents are all based on COE 42p6 kernel.

 Action:

 To update with COE 42p9 documents.

 ______________________________________________________________________________
 COMMENT                                           Enhancement Request Number 2
 douglas.johnson Bug in COE_Linux_PS Conformance Requirements (rdvk#  1)
 {sun-05}                                          Fri, 2 Jan 2004 20:36:53 GMT
 ______________________________________________________________________________
 Accept_____    Accept as marked below_X___     Duplicate_____     Reject_____
 Rationale for rejected or partial changes:

 To clarify: The SSRS is cross platform . Its the same for Linux and POSIX
 conformance requirements, the "COE Platform Security" Product Standard
 referred to by the COE Linux Platform Product Standard
 is the product standard that exists already,  X02CR
 http://www.opengroup.org/publications/catalog/x02cr.htm,
 which refers to C035 (the SSRS)
 http://www.opengroup.org/publications/catalog/c035.htm

 Therefore no change is necessary to this document.


 ______________________________________________________________________________
 Page: 4  Line: 59  Section: Conformance


 Problem:

 Confirm that the "COE Plaform Security" requirement refers to the same
 document as that for POSIX-compliant COE platforms.

 Action:

 Clarify the identity of the COE Platform Security conformance
 requirement document. E.g. is there a different one for Linux vs. POSIX
 platforms?



 ______________________________________________________________________________
 COMMENT                                           Enhancement Request Number 3
 douglas.johnson Bug in COE_Linux_PS Conformance Requirements (rdvk#  2)
 {sun-03}                                          Fri, 2 Jan 2004 20:24:39 GMT
 ______________________________________________________________________________
 Accept_____    Accept as marked below_X___     Duplicate_____     Reject_____
 Rationale for rejected or partial changes:

 Change "any specific name" to "any specific host name"

 ______________________________________________________________________________
 Page: 4  Line: 72  Section: Conformance


 Problem:

 Clarify if "any specific name" refers to host name.

 Action:

 Replace "name" with "host name", or otherwise clarify if reference is to user names, group names, etc.




 _____________________________________________________________________________
 COMMENT                                          Enhancement Request Number 4
 douglas.johnson               Bug in COE_Linux_PS Migration (rdvk#  3)
 {sun-04}                                         Fri, 2 Jan 2004 20:30:06 GMT
 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Accept_____    Accept as marked below_X___     Duplicate_____     Reject_____
 Rationale for rejected or partial changes:

Change to "...multiple processor architectures" ->" ...various architectures."

 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Page: 4  Line: 91  Section: Migration


 Problem:

 Clarify the meaning of "multiple processor architectures".

 Action:

 Clarify if "multiple processor architectures" refers to different
 processor architectures (e.g. IA-32, IA-64, Sparc, PowerPC, etc.) or to
 single systems with a single OS running on multiple CPUs.