Problem Report Number | 0047 (TSD.0033) |
---|---|
Submitter's Classification | Test Suite Problem (TSD) |
State | Resolved |
Resolution | Test Suite Deficiency (TSD) |
Raised | 2004-01-21 14:43 |
Updated | 2004-02-24 10:02 |
Published | 2004-02-24 10:02 |
Certification Program | Linux Standard Base Conformance Release 1.3 |
Test Suite | lsb-runtime IA32 version 1.3.6-3 |
Test Identification | /tset/LSB.fhs/root/bin/bin-tc 49 |
Location in Spec | FHS not listed in the spec choices. FHS 2.2 - 3.4.2 |
Problem Summary | Test for the existence of an exec-able [ in /bin or /usr/bin fails due to change in behavior of [. |
Problem Text | Behavior of "[" has changed. Calling it with no arguments previously returned nothing, now returns an error. Test suite should perhaps test for the existence of the file in another manner, like using find? Binary comes from coreutils-5.1.1. |
Test Output | /tset/LSB.fhs/root/bin/bin-tc 49 Failed Test Information: Reference 3.4-49 (A) The implementation provides an exec-able version of the [ utility in the /bin or /usr/bin directory. exit code 126 returned, expected 0 Unexpected output written to stderr, as shown below: stderr:/home/tet/test_sets/TESTROOT/tset/LSB.fhs/root/bin/bin-tc: line 303: /bin/[: No such file or directory stderr:/home/tet/test_sets/TESTROOT/tset/LSB.fhs/root/bin/bin-tc: line 303: exec: /bin/[: cannot execute: No such file or directory Not found in /bin, checking /usr/bin exit code 2 returned, expected 0 Unexpected output written to stderr, as shown below: stderr:/usr/bin/[: missing `]' |
Review Type | TSMA Review |
---|---|
Start Date | 2004-01-21 14:43 |
Last Updated | 2004-01-27 15:26 |
Completed | 2004-01-27 15:26 |
Status | Complete |
Review Recommendation | Duplicate (DUP) |
Review Response | This is a duplicate of PR 0038. |
Review Type | SA Review |
---|---|
Start Date | 2004-01-27 15:26 |
Last Updated | 2004-01-30 06:30 |
Completed | 2004-01-30 06:30 |
Status | Complete |
Review Resolution | Test Suite Deficiency (TSD) |
Review Conclusion | Initially this was marked as is a duplicate of PR 0038. However as this is a different test suite version (other architecture) it should be a TSD. A TSD is therefore granted. |
Copyright 2005, The Free Standards Group, All Rights Reserved