PR0047.html

LSB Problem Report

Problem Report Number 0047 (TSD.0033)
Submitter's Classification Test Suite Problem (TSD)
State Resolved
Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
Raised 2004-01-21 14:43
Updated 2004-02-24 10:02
Published 2004-02-24 10:02
Certification Program Linux Standard Base Conformance Release 1.3
Test Suite lsb-runtime IA32 version 1.3.6-3
Test Identification /tset/LSB.fhs/root/bin/bin-tc 49
Location in Spec FHS not listed in the spec choices.

FHS 2.2 - 3.4.2
Problem Summary Test for the existence of an exec-able [ in /bin or /usr/bin fails due
to change in behavior of [.
Problem Text Behavior of "[" has changed. Calling it with no arguments previously
returned nothing, now returns an error. Test suite should perhaps test
for the existence of the file in another manner, like using find?

Binary comes from coreutils-5.1.1.

Test Output /tset/LSB.fhs/root/bin/bin-tc 49 Failed

Test Information:
Reference 3.4-49 (A)
The implementation provides an exec-able version of the [
utility in the /bin or /usr/bin directory.
exit code 126 returned, expected 0
Unexpected output written to stderr, as shown below:

stderr:/home/tet/test_sets/TESTROOT/tset/LSB.fhs/root/bin/bin-tc: line
303: /bin/[: No such file or directory

stderr:/home/tet/test_sets/TESTROOT/tset/LSB.fhs/root/bin/bin-tc: line
303: exec: /bin/[: cannot execute: No such file or directory
Not found in /bin, checking /usr/bin
exit code 2 returned, expected 0
Unexpected output written to stderr, as shown below:
stderr:/usr/bin/[: missing `]'

Review Information

Review Type TSMA Review
Start Date 2004-01-21 14:43
Last Updated 2004-01-27 15:26
Completed 2004-01-27 15:26
Status Complete
Review Recommendation Duplicate (DUP)
Review Response This is a duplicate of PR 0038.

Review Type SA Review
Start Date 2004-01-27 15:26
Last Updated 2004-01-30 06:30
Completed 2004-01-30 06:30
Status Complete
Review Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
Review Conclusion Initially this was marked as is a duplicate of PR 0038. However
as this is a different test suite version (other architecture) it
should be a TSD. A TSD is therefore granted.

 

Copyright 2005, The Free Standards Group, All Rights Reserved