Comments on Interpretations Austin-288r1 Page 1 of 1 Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. April 20, 2006 This document records comments received on interpretations. This will be discussed at the next teleconference. This document will be amended as further comments come in that need discussion. Editorial comments will have been addressed by the editor and not added to this document Austin-061:XSH sched_setscheduler:scheduling The last paragraph of the "Notes to the Editor" says: "If the scheduling policy of the target process is either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR, the sched_ss_low_priority , sched_ss_repl_period , and sched_ss_init_budget members of the param argument shall have no effect on the scheduling behavior." Is there some reason for not including sched_ss_max_repl here?