Minutes of the 16 Sep 2010 Teleconference     Austin-497 Page 1 of 1
Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group.    September 17 , 2010

Attendees
Andrew Josey, The Open Group
Don Cragun,  PASC OR
Nick Stoughton, USENIX, ISO/IEC OR
Eric Blake, Red Hat
Mark Brown, IBM, TOG OR 
Geoff Clare, The Open Group

Apologies
Ulrich Drepper, Red Hat


* Old Business

The following open action is carried forward.

Identify Issue 7 interpretations with non controversial changes.
Open -- no volunteer assigned yet.

We reviewed the Actions carried forward from the last meeting.

Andrew had completed his action to start new interpretations.

Andrew had completed the action to review Issue 6 Aardvark
for candidate bugs for inclusion in TC1 or Issue 8.
We reviewed these.

XCUbug2 ERN 177 

It was agreed to move this into Mantis , but to reject it 
due to incompatibilities with existing practise.

Don agreed to take the action.

XCUbug2 ERN 180 pax

It was agreed to put this into Mantis and to make it a TC1-2008 candidate.

XSHbug2 ERN 234 and 236

No action necessary as these have been included in Issue 7

XSHbug2 ERN 253 ctime

This should be added to Mantis. It should be sent down the interpretations
track, with the recommendation that the standard is silent.
It should also be tagged as a TC1-2008 candidate.

XSHbug2 ERN 252 MX no NaN

This is considered editorial and should be included in TC1-2008
(include in Mantis)

XSHbug2 ERN 249 pthread_sigmask

This is a TC1-2008 candidate, and should be entered into mantis. 

Add a note that in a future revision we should look at all cases of
lists of functions to see if they can be replaced by a general concept.

XSHbug2 ERN 248.

No need for an interpretation as this matches historic practice.
This is a TC1-2008 candidate and should be entered into mantis.


XSHbug2 ERN 247 aio_write

This should be sent down the interpretations track, with the 
recommendation that the standard is ambiguous.
It should be tagged as a TC1-2008 candidate.

XSHbug2 ERN 238

Already entered into mantis as an interpretation. 
It should be tagged as a TC1-2008 candidate.


XSHbug2 ERN 232

This references Austin 214. It should be marked for Issue 8.

XSHbug2 ERN 231  

It shouldbe marked for Issue 8

XSHbug2 ERN 230

It should be tagged as a TC1-2008 candidate.

Action: Andrew to start a new batch of interpretations for 30 day review.
A new batch has been started for bugs 255,301,308 and 317.


* We picked up on regular Bug processing

Bug 249

Accepted

Action Andrew to ask Dave Korn whether he objects to the standard 
requiring the shell to support \u and \U .

Next Steps
----------
The next call will be on September 23rd at 16:00 UK time/08:00 Pacific and
will continue processing defect reports.

http://austingroupbugs.net

See the calendar for the list of dialup numbers.

An IRC  channel will be available for the meeting
 irc://irc.freestandards.org #austin

ICAL: http://www.google.com/calendar/ical/nvctqtstkuni3fab9k3jqtrt4g@group.calendar.google.com/public/basic
XML: http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/nvctqtstkuni3fab9k3jqtrt4g@group.calendar.google.com/public/basic